The end of the line for Bolivia’s president

Chicago TribuneFor Bolivia’s Evo Morales, elections have been moments of triumph. Since he emerged from the rural labor movement to win the presidency in late 2005, the fiery political maverick has won three straight contests to become his nation’s longest serving president.

So it came as a blow last week when Bolivians narrowly rejected a proposal to change their constitution to allow Morales to run for a fourth term and potentially stay in office until 2025. It seems that even one of Latin America’s most celebrated autocrats has fallen prey to his own appetite for power and the perils of mortgaging a nation to China’s expanding global ambitions.

Although Bolivia is small and poor, Morales, the country’s first indigenous president, has played an emblematic role in the now fading “pink tide” of Latin American countries governed by leftists. Yes, the charismatic populist could intimidate opponents and rail at imperialists with the rest of the Bolivarian bullies, but he marshaled his raw-materials bonanza more sensibly than spendthrift counterparts such as Argentina’s Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner or the late Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez.

Such a record helped cast Morales as a “good autocrat,” in the words of journalist Andres Oppenheimer, and that myth, along with generous social spending, played well on the Bolivian stump. “There is just one Fidel, one Mandela, one Gandhi… and one Evo,” his foreign minister, David Choquehuanca, recently told El País.

But apparently voters have now decided that Morales is dispensable, and it’s hard not to imagine how a succession of scandals — from alleged embezzlement at a government-financed indigenous development fund to a suspicious arson attack on a rival mayor’s offices that left six dead — helped set the stage for his defeat. …



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Latest Tweets by @IASecurity

Videos Featuring Our Experts

Kingpins and corruption: Targeting transnational organized crime in the Americas Roger Noriega on the Crisis in Venezuela: The world's response | IN 60 SECONDS

Venezuelan crisis: A brief history by Roger Noriega | IN 60 SECONDS

WAC Philadelphia: Latin America’s Role in 2017 and Beyond, feat. José R. Cárdenas

Promo for CNN's AC360°: "Passports in the shadows", feat. Roger Noriega

Ambassador Roger Noriega on PBS NewsHour discussing U.S.-Mexico relations under Trump

José Cárdenas Interview with Opinion Journal: "Hungry in Venezuela"

Ambassador Noriega Analyzes President Obama’s visit to Cuba on PBS’ ‘Newshour’


During the last several decades, the United States has invested billions of dollars in trying to help the governments of Latin America and the Caribbean deliver better lives for their citizens. This has meant helping them increase internal security by combating the illicit growing and trafficking in narcotics and the activities of terrorist groups, as well as helping them to shore up their democratic and free market institutions.

Unfortunately, in recent years, continued progress in these areas has been threatened, not least by the elections of radical populist governments in Venezuela, Bolivia, and Ecuador. These governments have instituted retrograde agendas that include the propagation of class warfare, state domination of the economy, assaults on private property, anti-Americanism, support for such international pariahs as Iran, and lackluster support for regional counter-terrorism and counter-narcotics initiatives.

We are a group of concerned policy experts that fear the results of these destructive agendas for individual freedom, prosperity, and the well-being of the peoples of the region. Our goal is to inform American policymakers and American and international public opinion of the dangers of these radical populist regimes to inter-American security.