Ecuador angers Peru by building border wall

BBCWhile US President Donald Trump’s proposed Mexican border wall has garnered much international attention, another controversial wall has sprung up further south.

It stands between Ecuador and Peru, and, even though it only spans 1km (0.6 miles), the Peruvians are not happy.

On Monday, Peru recalled its ambassador to Ecuador in protest, saying the construction violated a 1998 peace treaty.

Ecuador says it is a flood precaution.

Peru argues that disrupting the water flow could raise the flooding risk on its side.

There are also concerns it will affect informal trading between residents.

The border between the two countries runs over more than 1,500km (900 miles), but the new wall spans a tiny stretch between Huaquillas in southern Ecuador and Aguas Verdes in Peru.

It stands under four metres (13ft) high, running alongside a canal.

To cross the border between Aguas Verdes in Peru and Huaquillas in Ecuador, all you need to do is jump over a narrow channel of stagnant water.

Although most people prefer to use small, informal wooden bridges.

On both sides are chaotic markets, where both Ecuadorian dollars and Peruvian are accepted.

“For breakfast I sometimes buy bread in one country and butter in the other,” one local joked to BBC Mundo.

Yet although the new construction has prompted strong reactions from officials, this is no Donald Trump-style wall.

It takes just minutes to walk from one end to the other.

The Ecuadorean government said it “lamented” Peru’s decision to bring its ambassador back to Lima for discussions, adding that it would not allow the move to “paralyse work it is carrying out on its own territory”.

“The Government of Ecuador has built a wall… in spite of requests made by Peru to stop the work,” said the Peruvian foreign ministry.

The two countries had a one-month militarised border conflict in 1995 over disputed jungle territory. Dozens of people were killed.

The current diplomatic spat is not a good start to relations under two relatively new leaders.

Ecuador’s President Lenin Moreno took office in May and Peru’s Pedro Pablo Kuczynski is still in the first year of his presidency.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Latest Tweets by @IASecurity

Videos Featuring Our Experts

Kingpins and corruption: Targeting transnational organized crime in the Americas Roger Noriega on the Crisis in Venezuela: The world's response | IN 60 SECONDS

Venezuelan crisis: A brief history by Roger Noriega | IN 60 SECONDS

WAC Philadelphia: Latin America’s Role in 2017 and Beyond, feat. José R. Cárdenas

Promo for CNN's AC360°: "Passports in the shadows", feat. Roger Noriega

Ambassador Roger Noriega on PBS NewsHour discussing U.S.-Mexico relations under Trump

José Cárdenas Interview with Opinion Journal: "Hungry in Venezuela"

Ambassador Noriega Analyzes President Obama’s visit to Cuba on PBS’ ‘Newshour’


During the last several decades, the United States has invested billions of dollars in trying to help the governments of Latin America and the Caribbean deliver better lives for their citizens. This has meant helping them increase internal security by combating the illicit growing and trafficking in narcotics and the activities of terrorist groups, as well as helping them to shore up their democratic and free market institutions.

Unfortunately, in recent years, continued progress in these areas has been threatened, not least by the elections of radical populist governments in Venezuela, Bolivia, and Ecuador. These governments have instituted retrograde agendas that include the propagation of class warfare, state domination of the economy, assaults on private property, anti-Americanism, support for such international pariahs as Iran, and lackluster support for regional counter-terrorism and counter-narcotics initiatives.

We are a group of concerned policy experts that fear the results of these destructive agendas for individual freedom, prosperity, and the well-being of the peoples of the region. Our goal is to inform American policymakers and American and international public opinion of the dangers of these radical populist regimes to inter-American security.